Hacker News Comments on
The Patent Scam Intro
Austin Meyer
·
Youtube
·
41
HN points
·
11
HN comments
- This course is unranked · view top recommended courses
Hacker News Stories and Comments
All the comments and stories posted to Hacker News that reference this video.I don't know much about both, but xplane is developed by private developer, he even made video how he fought against patent trolls: https://youtu.be/sG9UMMq2dz4
Just watched this video [1] by someone who got sued because his "android app uses a license server".Those patent troll shell companies sue one victim after another and forward the incoming money to other companies. So there's no use in going after them directly. The victim can negotiate better terms if he signs a non-disclosure agreement. The patent trolls are protected by politicians, judges and lawyers.
URL: https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=sG9UMMq2dz4 (Austin Myers)URL: https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=3bxcc3SM_KA (John Olivier)
Above two YouTube videos I’ve been passing around in regard to sometimes peculiar nature of patents law in US and in particular that of eastern district of TX.
All patents should be worthless, the fact that trolls can come after anyone for uploading an app to google play store for fees and win because of some obscure patent is ridiculous. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sG9UMMq2dz4
additionally:The Patent scam intro by Austin Meyer https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sG9UMMq2dz4
For anyone looking for an ~20 minute intro to why this is a big deal and the impact it has on small tech companies: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sG9UMMq2dz4tl;dw: There are some over-broad patents on usage of very common technologies (using wifi or selling on the google play store are two egregious examples) that are being used as a bludgeon against small and medium sized firms that can't afford to defend themselves. It costs about $3 million to defend against such a suit, and the Eastern district is known for refusing to force plaintiffs to pay defendant's attorney's fees even if the suit is ultimately dropped.
⬐ monochromaticUnfortunately, there's a lot of misinformation and half-truth in that video.⬐ Banthum⬐ lightedmanI'd be very interested in specifics on this.⬐ staticautomaticI work in the field, and on both sides of patent litigation. As far as I can see, there is no misinformation or half-truths in that video. What he's talking about is entirely real and relatively common, but it is not categorically true of all trolls.Sue the Eastern District for unequal application of the law. It's easily provable with the current track record.⬐ clamprecht⬐ blazespinCan you even sue a court? Seems too good to be true.⬐ staticautomatic⬐ pg_is_a_buttYes, there are ways to sue the courts themselves, but not for something like this. The suit would generally be in the form of what's called a Writ of Mandate. It's basically a lawsuit for when you have no other legal recourse for something. For example, if you went to a courthouse and asked for a copy of a statutorily public document but they refused to give it to you, you could file a such a writ. It would force the court to at least give you a hearing before a judge, who you'd ask to compel the court personnel to give you what you asked for.⬐ vivekdno - the best you can do is get it appealed to a higher court.⬐ kevindkeoghNot in this case. You would need to have standing and a relevant claim to sue any person or firm. I would think it would pretty difficult to show sort of generalized claim about the injustices of the patent system. That is a political question, not a legal question.⬐ nerdponxCould a tech company, as a potential futute patent holder, sue?⬐ justincliftClass action by victims of patent trolls?buy guns⬐ SparkyMcUnicornSounds great, but it seems like something Newegg or Costco's lawyers would have started on already if it were feasible.⬐ jhall1468Costco's golf ball case was filed in the state where it's headquartered: Washington.⬐ dangerlibraryOnly because Costco pre-emptively sued the patent holding company in order to choose the venue.⬐ jhall1468True, but the point was, Costco doesn't have cause to do anything in East Texas.I dunno, I think it will just introduce more variability and stretch out the cases. East Rural texas was actually pretty good at litigating patents because they knew a lot about it since they did so many.Better would be to reform the patent law, maybe create short term 5 year patents or something.
⬐ mattnewton⬐ logicalleeThey did so many because of their notorious pro-patent holder stance made them the favorite place to file.just wanted to thank you for providing this summary.
This video from Austin Meyer (creator of X-Plane) is pretty eye-opening:Apparently there are TWO judges in the district, BOTH of whose own sons are lawyers in the same district. And BOTH sons handle a lot of the patent litigation, in front of their own fathers, the judges. Pretty incredible. Watch the video starting at about 5 minutes to see it.
⬐ ptaipaleIs that legal in the United States? I am astonished.⬐ AnimalMuppet⬐ corysamaIt ought to be automatic grounds for an appeal. On the other hand, then you have to afford not only the trial, but also the appeal, before you can get the baseless lawsuit to go away...⬐ ptaipaleOver here it would mean a criminal investigation against the judge and dismissal.⬐ AnimalMuppetThat would be better, yes.Out of curiosity, where's "over here"?
⬐ ptaipaleFinland, northern Europe. I'm fairly sure it would be the same in Sweden or Germany.The principle that a judge may not rule on a case where his close relative is an attorney seems to fairly universal. I don't understand how that could be accepted in Texas.
More info from the same person http://www.thepatentscam.com⬐ devoplysounds like a plot of a movie. brother vs brother in front of their father.⬐ optimuspaul⬐ lostboys67With their long lost half sister is on the jury and their mother is the Bailiff. I'd watch that if there was nothing else on.⬐ haikuginger⬐ hexane360Hell, I'd watch that even if there was other stuff on.Well the brothers are always the ones prosecuting.How does having such a close relative appear before a Judge even pass the most basic legal ethics test.Judges and Lawyers need to be like Casers wife above suspicion
So there is a judge out there, and his son is a practicing lawyer who reps. PT and PT victims. Basically legal racketeering. It would be interesting to see emails dumped from these guys, and how much corruption is taking place.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sG9UMMq2dz4 its like 5 min in.
This is great. Would like to see more of these kinds of efforts.Just watched The Patent Scam video by Austin Meyer (developer of X-Plane flight sim who was sued by patent trolls).
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sG9UMMq2dz4
That kind of stuff makes my blood boil.
⬐ JTonI remember watching this video here, a while back. Has Google stepped up in defense of Austin yet?⬐ ideaphoreThanks. It makes our blood boil too.
⬐ KeverwSounds like a conflict of interest. Why is a son allowed to be a lawyer where their dad is also a judge in the same jurisdiction? There should be another judge stepping in when so closely related to be fair.Just like how the president can't be from any other country in case they had to attack their own country.
⬐ teh_klevFrom a couple of months ago by Austin Meyer (the chap in the video above):⬐ probably_wrongI'm on mobile, so I can't watch the video. However, if it is the one that I think it is, didn't that judge retire already?Not that it makes the situation any better, but at least would require a "sons of former judge" in the title
Edit: Yup, John Ward retired in 2011[1] and Leonard Davis retired in May 2015... to join an IP law firm[2].
[1] http://www.wsfirm.com/attorneys/t-john-ward/ [2] http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2015/04/east-texas-judge-...
⬐ hmngHope this goes viral in some way. I think it can make non technical people aware of the problem.