HN Theater @HNTheaterMonth

The best talks and videos of Hacker News.

Hacker News Comments on
The Patent Scam Intro

Austin Meyer · Youtube · 41 HN points · 11 HN comments
HN Theater has aggregated all Hacker News stories and comments that mention Austin Meyer's video "The Patent Scam Intro".
Youtube Summary
The most common reply to this video: "I would just IGNORE them and they would go away!"
Well, here is how it works: If you do NOT reply to them then they just run the judge and say: "He never replied to our lawsuit! We request summary judgement for XXXX dollars", where XXXX is whatever number they make up as their "damages". The judge grants summary judgement since you never showed up and then they have a lien for whatever dollar amount they made up. Now they take out liens on your bank account, and also run to Apple and Google to garnish your wages, so any money you make from your App goes to the trolls. So, ignoring it is the lowest-effort, most-profitable possible outcome for the troll: They just make up any damages they want, receive summary judgement, and then take out a lien on your bank account and any income stream that you have. It's called garnishing wages.

Now on to the description: The corruption runs deeper than you'd ever imagine. A multi-billion dollar industry you've never heard of. This is the world Patent Trolls thrive in: A world created for them by our own U. S. Patent system. You can be sued for clicking on a hyperlink, using your own scanner, or sharing your Wi-Fi! It sounds insane, but the reality is even crazier. Patent Trolls look for obvious ideas, patent them, and then sue anyone they claim is infringing on their idea. People's lives and businesses are being destroyed.. and they have no way out. “The Patent Scam” exposes the underbelly of this system, and the people that commit this practice.

Follow The Patent Scam on the Web:
Web: http://ThePatentScam.com
Facebook: http://facebook.com/patentdocumentary
Twitter: http://twitter.com/thepatentscam



Where to watch Full Video:

YouTube: http://bit.ly/2uFWEul
Amazon Video: http://amzn.to/2i4uMdA
FandangoNOW: http://bit.ly/2uGtTOd
Google Play: http://bit.ly/2vYpJkq
iTunes: http://apple.co/2fHKTg6
Vimeo: http://bit.ly/2uLPEI4
Vudu: http://bit.ly/2waHmxc
Microsoft XBOX: http://bit.ly/2vACTD4


See it on TV:
Comcast, Dish Network, Cox, Charter, Verizon, and more.


Buy it on physical DVDs and Blu-Ray:
- Amazon DVD: http://amzn.to/2uFUkDF
- Amazon BD: http://amzn.to/2x1cHzl

Follow The Patent Scam on the Web:
- Web: http://ThePatentScam.com
- Facebook: http://facebook.com/patentdocumentary
- Twitter: http://twitter.com/thepatentscam
Cast: Austin Meyer Peter Braxton Alex Haro Bill Chastain Lee Cheng Drew Curtis Kate Doerkson Van Lindberg Todd Moore Kevin O'Connor Eric Rosebrock Michael Skelps Corey Tisdale Steven Vicinanza Colleen Chien
HN Theater Rankings

Hacker News Stories and Comments

All the comments and stories posted to Hacker News that reference this video.
Sep 13, 2022 · deepsun on X-Plane 12 Early Access
I don't know much about both, but xplane is developed by private developer, he even made video how he fought against patent trolls: https://youtu.be/sG9UMMq2dz4
Just watched this video [1] by someone who got sued because his "android app uses a license server".

Those patent troll shell companies sue one victim after another and forward the incoming money to other companies. So there's no use in going after them directly. The victim can negotiate better terms if he signs a non-disclosure agreement. The patent trolls are protected by politicians, judges and lawyers.

[1] https://youtu.be/sG9UMMq2dz4

URL: https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=sG9UMMq2dz4 (Austin Myers)

URL: https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=3bxcc3SM_KA (John Olivier)

Above two YouTube videos I’ve been passing around in regard to sometimes peculiar nature of patents law in US and in particular that of eastern district of TX.

All patents should be worthless, the fact that trolls can come after anyone for uploading an app to google play store for fees and win because of some obscure patent is ridiculous. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sG9UMMq2dz4
For anyone looking for an ~20 minute intro to why this is a big deal and the impact it has on small tech companies: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sG9UMMq2dz4

tl;dw: There are some over-broad patents on usage of very common technologies (using wifi or selling on the google play store are two egregious examples) that are being used as a bludgeon against small and medium sized firms that can't afford to defend themselves. It costs about $3 million to defend against such a suit, and the Eastern district is known for refusing to force plaintiffs to pay defendant's attorney's fees even if the suit is ultimately dropped.

monochromatic
Unfortunately, there's a lot of misinformation and half-truth in that video.
Banthum
I'd be very interested in specifics on this.
staticautomatic
I work in the field, and on both sides of patent litigation. As far as I can see, there is no misinformation or half-truths in that video. What he's talking about is entirely real and relatively common, but it is not categorically true of all trolls.
lightedman
Sue the Eastern District for unequal application of the law. It's easily provable with the current track record.
clamprecht
Can you even sue a court? Seems too good to be true.
staticautomatic
Yes, there are ways to sue the courts themselves, but not for something like this. The suit would generally be in the form of what's called a Writ of Mandate. It's basically a lawsuit for when you have no other legal recourse for something. For example, if you went to a courthouse and asked for a copy of a statutorily public document but they refused to give it to you, you could file a such a writ. It would force the court to at least give you a hearing before a judge, who you'd ask to compel the court personnel to give you what you asked for.
vivekd
no - the best you can do is get it appealed to a higher court.
kevindkeogh
Not in this case. You would need to have standing and a relevant claim to sue any person or firm. I would think it would pretty difficult to show sort of generalized claim about the injustices of the patent system. That is a political question, not a legal question.
nerdponx
Could a tech company, as a potential futute patent holder, sue?
justinclift
Class action by victims of patent trolls?
pg_is_a_butt
buy guns
SparkyMcUnicorn
Sounds great, but it seems like something Newegg or Costco's lawyers would have started on already if it were feasible.
jhall1468
Costco's golf ball case was filed in the state where it's headquartered: Washington.
dangerlibrary
Only because Costco pre-emptively sued the patent holding company in order to choose the venue.
jhall1468
True, but the point was, Costco doesn't have cause to do anything in East Texas.
blazespin
I dunno, I think it will just introduce more variability and stretch out the cases. East Rural texas was actually pretty good at litigating patents because they knew a lot about it since they did so many.

Better would be to reform the patent law, maybe create short term 5 year patents or something.

mattnewton
They did so many because of their notorious pro-patent holder stance made them the favorite place to file.
logicallee
just wanted to thank you for providing this summary.
This video from Austin Meyer (creator of X-Plane) is pretty eye-opening:

https://youtu.be/sG9UMMq2dz4

Apparently there are TWO judges in the district, BOTH of whose own sons are lawyers in the same district. And BOTH sons handle a lot of the patent litigation, in front of their own fathers, the judges. Pretty incredible. Watch the video starting at about 5 minutes to see it.

ptaipale
Is that legal in the United States? I am astonished.
AnimalMuppet
It ought to be automatic grounds for an appeal. On the other hand, then you have to afford not only the trial, but also the appeal, before you can get the baseless lawsuit to go away...
ptaipale
Over here it would mean a criminal investigation against the judge and dismissal.
AnimalMuppet
That would be better, yes.

Out of curiosity, where's "over here"?

ptaipale
Finland, northern Europe. I'm fairly sure it would be the same in Sweden or Germany.

The principle that a judge may not rule on a case where his close relative is an attorney seems to fairly universal. I don't understand how that could be accepted in Texas.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Judicial_disqualification

corysama
More info from the same person http://www.thepatentscam.com
devoply
sounds like a plot of a movie. brother vs brother in front of their father.
optimuspaul
With their long lost half sister is on the jury and their mother is the Bailiff. I'd watch that if there was nothing else on.
haikuginger
Hell, I'd watch that even if there was other stuff on.
hexane360
Well the brothers are always the ones prosecuting.
lostboys67
How does having such a close relative appear before a Judge even pass the most basic legal ethics test.

Judges and Lawyers need to be like Casers wife above suspicion

So there is a judge out there, and his son is a practicing lawyer who reps. PT and PT victims. Basically legal racketeering. It would be interesting to see emails dumped from these guys, and how much corruption is taking place.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sG9UMMq2dz4 its like 5 min in.

This is great. Would like to see more of these kinds of efforts.

Just watched The Patent Scam video by Austin Meyer (developer of X-Plane flight sim who was sued by patent trolls).

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sG9UMMq2dz4

That kind of stuff makes my blood boil.

JTon
I remember watching this video here, a while back. Has Google stepped up in defense of Austin yet?
ideaphore
Thanks. It makes our blood boil too.
Jul 29, 2016 · 26 points, 3 comments · submitted by ndesaulniers
Keverw
Sounds like a conflict of interest. Why is a son allowed to be a lawyer where their dad is also a judge in the same jurisdiction? There should be another judge stepping in when so closely related to be fair.

Just like how the president can't be from any other country in case they had to attack their own country.

teh_klev
From a couple of months ago by Austin Meyer (the chap in the video above):

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=11862476

probably_wrong
I'm on mobile, so I can't watch the video. However, if it is the one that I think it is, didn't that judge retire already?

Not that it makes the situation any better, but at least would require a "sons of former judge" in the title

Edit: Yup, John Ward retired in 2011[1] and Leonard Davis retired in May 2015... to join an IP law firm[2].

[1] http://www.wsfirm.com/attorneys/t-john-ward/ [2] http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2015/04/east-texas-judge-...

Jul 29, 2016 · 2 points, 0 comments · submitted by locusm
Jul 05, 2016 · 4 points, 0 comments · submitted by lsv1
Jun 20, 2016 · 2 points, 0 comments · submitted by uptown
Jun 15, 2016 · 6 points, 1 comments · submitted by hmng
hmng
Hope this goes viral in some way. I think it can make non technical people aware of the problem.
Jun 14, 2016 · 1 points, 0 comments · submitted by Polytoximaniac
HN Theater is an independent project and is not operated by Y Combinator or any of the video hosting platforms linked to on this site.
~ yaj@
;laksdfhjdhksalkfj more things
yahnd.com ~ Privacy Policy ~
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipisicing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.