HN Books @HNBooksMonth

The best books of Hacker News.

Hacker News Comments on
Winning the Games Scientists Play

Carl Sindermann, Carl J. Sindermann · 4 HN comments
HN Books has aggregated all Hacker News stories and comments that mention "Winning the Games Scientists Play" by Carl Sindermann, Carl J. Sindermann.
View on Amazon [↗]
HN Books may receive an affiliate commission when you make purchases on sites after clicking through links on this page.
Amazon Summary
In this inspiring book of personal insight and sound advice, veteran scientist Carl J. Sindermann gives an insider's look at the competitive world of science and reveals the best strategies for attaining prominence and success. Taking apart the many different roles scientists must play during their careers, Sindermann compares common mistakes scientists make with what the best strategists do-whether they are publishing papers, presenting data, chairing meetings, or coping with government or academic bureaucracy. In the end, he maintains, well-honed interpersonal skills, a savvy eye on one's competitors, and excellent science are the keys to a satisfying and successful career.
HN Books Rankings

Hacker News Stories and Comments

All the comments and stories posted to Hacker News that reference this book.
Useful book that any starting professor should understand, even if they don't want to admit they are playing a game. science-by-press-release is a technique to master if you want to both maximize the impact of your work, and get tenure.

https://www.amazon.com/Winning-Games-Scientists-Play-Sinderm...

Depends on what you define as "fabrication". Most scientists tweak things around to suit theories to look like facts, rather than deriving theories from facts. Winning the Games Scientists Play is a nice book [1] delves into this issue in some detail.

[1] http://www.amazon.com/Winning-Games-Scientists-Play-Sinderma...

yulhape
Perhaps an example of such tweaking is the "discovery" of black holes reported to the public, when the definition of a black hole precludes definitively observing them. What actually happens is that astronomers plug values for observations above a suspected black hole (e.g. the orbital speed of stars) into Einstein's theory of gravity, and let the theory tell them whether they "discovered" a black hole. Then they let the media report the black hole as a confirmation of Einstein's theory.
I had the same curiosity when I started graduate studies. This book helped a lot, it goes through this and many other academic/technical issues, giving a good insight on the "non-spoken" rules of the game and how scientists actually think. It was some kind of an underground classic at the time I went through it (earlier edition) and a very light and entertaining read.

http://www.amazon.com/Winning-Games-Scientists-Play-Sinderma...

HN Books is an independent project and is not operated by Y Combinator or Amazon.com.
~ yaj@
;laksdfhjdhksalkfj more things
yahnd.com ~ Privacy Policy ~
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipisicing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.