Hacker News Comments on
Statistics in a Nutshell: A Desktop Quick Reference (In a Nutshell (O'Reilly))
·
2
HN comments
HN Books has aggregated all Hacker News stories and comments that mention "Statistics in a Nutshell: A Desktop Quick Reference (In a Nutshell (O'Reilly))" by Sarah Boslaugh, Dr. Watters, Paul Andrew.
View on Amazon [↗]
HN Books may receive an affiliate commission when you make purchases
on sites after clicking through links on this page.
Amazon Summary
HN Books Rankings
- This course is unranked · view top recommended courses
Hacker News Stories and Comments
All the comments and stories posted to Hacker News that reference this book.
⬐
Oct 25, 2009
·
sh1mmer on
Ask HN: Statistics for hackers?
I've been pretty impressed by the O'Reilly book on statistic: http://www.amazon.com/Statistics-Nutshell-Desktop-Reference-...
⬐ fharsI am pretty ambivalent about that book. It covers a lot of territory with pointers to deeper literature with a clear emhasis on using these techniques with a statistics program like SPSS (or R), which is nice, but it still wastes a lot of space printing intermediate tables for simple examples which don't do much except filling pages.But the real bummer is the editorial quality. There aren't any three consecutive pages without major typographical or editorial errors like missing parantheses in complex formulas or cases where they obviolsly replaced examples with simpler ones but forgot to change the illustrations together with the text.
⬐
Oct 25, 2009
·
zackattack on
Ask HN: Statistics for hackers?
You should write a book, statistics for hackers. I would buy it. Make sure it explains things really well. The best person to teach someone is a beginner, because they understand the beginner's perspective. So you are in a unique position to create this.O'Reillys statistics in a nutshell is a good reference* book, but not quite a textbook. Here you go. Including my refid. http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0596510497?ie=UTF8&tag=...
*True masters have beginner perspectives, so they are good teachers as well.
⬐ haliaxI'm tempted. Though might a blog be better? Also, it might be nice to have someone to do it with, as then I could get explanations for things that befoggle me.⬐ zackhamI'd like to learn the same things as you - interested in doing so collaboratively? I am also interested in exploring online collaborative learning methods, so this appeals to me for both reasons. Find my email in my profile and get in touch if you're interested, I have a few ideas on how this could benefit us both.⬐ zackattackIt'd be better to have it with a table of contents. You could probably get sufficient explanations through a combination of research on wikipedia and then probing #math on freenode.⬐ anonymousDan⬐ liebkeJust out of interest, how long does it generally take for a question to get answered on #math? Does it vary quite a lot, or is it fairly stable (assuming someone can actually answer it)?⬐ zackattacki typically get answers immediately, but i've only asked questions up to college algebraI've enjoyed blogging about statistical programming (http://incanter-blog.org), it's been a great way to dig into subjects that interest me.